World Science Database
Home Scientists Abstracts Books Events Journals Experiments Topics Index More Find Login
Scientists Interests Profession Websites Notables Countries World Map Recent Memorials Memorial More

Dr. Louis Essen

Great Bookham, Surrey
United Kingdom

Map It

View count: 402
Essen, Dr. Louis     (Easy Link: http://www.worldsci.org/people/Louis_Essen)
Physicist (Deceased)

Topics: Relativity
Interests: Time, Relativity, Atomic Clocks
Nationality: English
Born: Sunday, September 6, 1908
Died: Sunday, August 24, 1997 (Age 88)

Memorial Wall: read / add a dedication

Related Websites:

Wikipedia: Louis Essen


Books:
1971The Special Theory of Relativity: A Critical Analysis

Abstracts Online:
1988Relativity - Joke or Swindle?
1984Letter from Louis Essen to Carl A Zapffe: Harry Ricker Commentary
1978Relativity and Time Signals
1977Atomic Clocks Coming and Going

Biography

Born in Nottingham in 1908, Essen studied at University College Nottingham and earned his physics degree in 1928 from the University of London. He started work at the National Physics Laboratory (NPL) the following year, under D. W. Dye, investigating the potential of tuning forks and quartz crystal oscillators for precise time measurement. His research led to his development of the quartz ring clock in 1938, the clock soon becoming a standard for time measurement atobservatories throughout the world.

Essen earned his Ph.D. (1941) and D.Sc. (1948) in physics from the University of London. During World War II, Essen worked on radar and developed a number of instruments, including the cavity resonance wavemeter. This work led to Essen's 1946 measurement of the speed of light by comparing the geometry of resonant cavities with normal mode wavelengths. His interest in the frequency of atomic spectra led Essen to propose a more precise measure of time through the atomic oscillations of caesium. In 1955, he developed, in collaboration with Jack Perry, the first practical atomic clock by integrating the caesium atomic standard with conventional quartz crystal oscillators to allow calibration of existing time-keeping. Soon after the caesium spectrum became the international time standard.

With the track record and authority Essen commanded, especially regarding time, one would think his was a voice to be heard. Yet his late-in-life objections to special relativity met with a cold reception, especially from his employers at NPL. The publication of his 1971 book, The Special Theory of Relativity: A Critical Analysis, led to a strongly encouraged retirement in 1972. Essen continued to publish papers against Einstein's theories and supported the dissident movement in the years prior to his death in 1997.

Articles:

  • "An Atomic Standard of Frequency and Time Keeping," Nature, V176, p. 280-282 (Aug 1955). (with J. V. L. Perry)
  • "The Clock Paradox of Relativity," Nature, V180, N4594, pp. 1061-1062 (1957).
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, S-A, V270, pp. 312-314 (1962).

Books by Dr. Louis Essen



View count: 531
The Special Theory of Relativity: A Critical Analysis

by Dr. Louis Essen

Pages: 28
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 1971
ISBN: 0198519214
ISBN: 978-0198519218

Websites: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Essen

Read it now online

Buy it now

Papers by Dr. Louis Essen



Relativity and Time Signals

(1978)

Dr. Louis Essen
Great Bookham, Surrey, United Kingdom, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Essen


Wireless World, No. Oct, pp. 44-45
Keywords: tick, clock, time, relativity

Lookup: relativity (606), time (239), clock (56)

Abstract:

One of the earliest applications of radio was the transmission of time signals as an aid to sea navigation and today signals are used to synchronize atomic time throughout the world for navigational and other purposes. The comparison of distant clocks by radio is now a precise and well known technique. This was not the case in 1905 when Einstein published his famous paper on relativity and there is some excuse for the mistakes he made in the thought experiments which he described in order to determine the relative rates of two identical clicks in uniform relative motion. But there is not excuse for their repetition in the current literature.



Atomic Clocks Coming and Going

(1977)

Dr. Louis Essen
Great Bookham, Surrey, United Kingdom, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Essen


Creation Research Society Quarterly
Keywords: clocks, time, relativity, caesium clocks

Lookup: relativity (606), time (239)

Abstract:

The authors of the Hafele and Keating atomic clock experiment in their theorical discussion, ignore detailed and fully documented criticisms of Einstein's relativity theory which have been made and have not been refuted.



Letter from Louis Essen to Carl A Zapffe: Harry Ricker Commentary

(1984)

Dr. Louis Essen
Great Bookham, Surrey, United Kingdom, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Essen


General Science Journal, (5 pages)
Keywords: Louis Essen, special relativity, Carl Zapffe

Lookup: special relativity (214), carl zapffe (2), relativity (606), special (276)

Abstract:

This paper presents a transcription of a letter from Louis Essen to Dr. Carl Zapffe. It briefly summarises Dr. Essen's criticism of special relativity in a few lines. Its most memorable statement is that relativity is "not a theory".  A commentary by Harry Ricker puts Dr. Essen's letter into perspective.



Relativity - Joke or Swindle?

(1988)

Dr. Louis Essen
Great Bookham, Surrey, United Kingdom, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Essen


Electronics and Wireless World, Volume 94, pp. 126-127
Keywords: relativity

Lookup: relativity (606)

Abstract:

Some of your contributors find it difficult to accept my contention (WW October, 1978) that Einstein’s theory of relativity is invalidated by its internal errors. Butterfield for example (WW February, 1987) denies that there is any duplication of units or any harm in obtaining results from thought-experiments. Moreover, if my contention is correct, the new experimental work described by Aspden (EWW, August, 1987 ) is not required to disprove the theory, although it might confirm that his assumptions were wrong. This is not to suggest that experimental results are not important but they should be considered as steps in the development of new theories.

Discussions about the theory tend to be very involved and your readers may be interested in a brief history of the subject which I wrote some time ago for a friend who wanted to know what the controversy was about and in particular what was the significance of the clock paradox...