Interests: Correction, Aristotle, Galileo, Newton, Einstein
Nationality: Indian / USA
Age: 67
Born: Sunday, April 26, 1942
Assumptions:
1. There is an anthroptimum God.
2. I exist, I did not create myself, You exist, you did not create yourself as surely as I did not create you.
3. Everything is a virtual particle, has purpose, happens in real time and has infinite variety, is temporary.
4.Except God, everything changes but not enough to violate law of bio-genesis (Life begets life)
5. Zero and infinity are a couplet( even synonyms)
6. Any and every infinitesimal part of infinity is infinite in its own right unless placed in a partitioned infinity.
7. There is no such thing as non-physical traveling wave.
(2010-01-23 11:20:42)
Definitions:
Structure of Physical Unniverse:
Structure of matter (mass, stuff, objects etc) and the structure universe is the dynamic [equilibrium, dead end stop or solitary mass (No other mass in the vicinity as at or near the edge of the universe) in motion] relationship between the trio of 1) mass (matter, objects or its synonyms), 2) motion and 3) time within our range of perception (with or without instrumentation)encompassing infinite variety of geometric shapes, beyond which range the structural infinite variety continues from infinitesimal to infinity, notwithstanding a dynamic structure may appear static if beyond human perception range and/or against a STOP (AKA Dead-End). The weight of the universe is about 100 orders of magnitude greater than one gram.
(2010-01-30 12:47:19)
LIGHT:
The Electromagnetic information collection and imparting via virtual particles "Photons" through a unitary whole universal medium.
(2010-01-24 19:35:24)
GRAVITY:
The equal and opposite reaction to any and all uncompensated orbital (Hybrid Linear & angular) acceleration, however caused, in three orthogonal-motion frames of references.
(2010-01-23 11:41:55)
TIME:
The ratio of distance traversed by/to speed of a mass in motion. Like the 3 legged stool, time, mass and motion are inseparable. They are born together, grow proportionately together and will end together at speed approaching 0 or c both have the same effect. The trio starts from infinite time (or infinitesimal frequency) and infinitesimal mass and infinitesimal motion. Time is also reciprocal of frequency aka wavelength. Accordingly as motion and mass approach zero, time tends to infinity or eternity.
(2010-01-27 17:45:46)
Zero (Nothhing) Micro-Infinity:
The synonym of micro-infinity. Absolute Zero or nothing is not ?a? but ?the? synonym of infinity. More particularly micro-infinity as contrasted from macro-infinity. In absolute terms there are three and only three numbers [0, 1 & Infinity(micro or macro)] which equal each other as well as their reciprocals (0=1=Infinity = 1/0 = 1/Infinity = 1/0) as contrasted from physical relative numbers where zero and infinity are at the opposite end of the spectrum. Zero is relative to something else like one computer v/s no computer or 6 billion people on earth but zero on moon or one or a few apples v/s none or zero. They are all finite. Of the 3 absolute numbers we happen to share one finite number (1=1/1) which not surprisingly also equals its own reciprocal. One way to avoid mental tension when contemplating equivalence of zero and infinity is to think of zero as micro-infinity and infinity as macro-infinity. You can then convert micro-infinity to macro-infinity by merely zooming in and conversely you can convert macro-infinity to micro infinity by zooming out.
(2010-02-03 20:19:30)
MASS:
The unitless sum of atomic weights of all the atoms in the "stuff"
OUR PAL ASIJA PATENT ATTORNEY AND PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER B.Sc., Grad IERE (Lond), P.G.D. (Wales), MBA, PE, CDP, JD
S. Pal Asija, was born in India, educated in England and became a U. S. Citizen in 1972. He has 4 graduate degrees, is a registered professional engineer and is admitted to practice before the U. S. Supreme Court. He is an inventor as well as a patent attorney. Our Pal has authored 4 books, obtained 4 federal trademarks, patented 6 inventions, published over 50 articles and has made over 100 group presentations. His numerous accomplishments appear in over 100 international press and TV reports. He uses proprietary audio-visual and audience participation techniques in all his presentations. He is a founding member of several inventors' Organizations. He has won numerous awards for inventing and public speaking in USA as well abroad. He is featured in 5 books not authored by him. He handled the In-line skates trademark litigation "Rollerblade Inc. v/s Turbo Blade Inc." Dr. S Pal Asija is listed in Whos Who in the World and in 1990 he was inducted into the Hall of Fame for Engineering Science and Technology for inventing & successfully prosecuting the first software patent. ASIJA is a frequently invited speaker and consultant on innovation and patent matters worldwide. He was a founding SYSOP (System Operator) of CompuServe's forum on Ideas and Inventions in charge of Laws and Protection section. He is serving on the boards of directors of several organizations. He is an inventor coach as well as on-line faculty. He is a European Roving Reporter for Inventors Digest of USA, the North American International Correspondent for Inventors World of UK as well as a regular contributor to such publications as Business Developments of New Zealand, Dream Merchant of California and IndustryScoop of Cyberspace.
In his own home Pal hosts a bi-monthly Futurists & Inventors (F&I) Challenge meeting, discussing philosophical ideas of the broadest scope.
Summary
4 graduate degrees.
20 years experience in systems engineering, telecommunications, aerospace, technology transfer, management and patents, trademarks and copyrights.
A creative results oriented entrepreneur with 6 patents, 4 trademarks, 4 books, 50 articles and over 100 group presentations.
Knowledge of German language. Listed in Whos Who in the World.
Obtained the first software patent ever.
Inducted into the Hall of Fame for Engineering Science & Technology.
Education
Doctor of Jurisprudence NKU/Salmon P. Chase 1974
MBA University of Dayton, Ohio 1970
Post Graduate Diploma University of Wales, Cardiff, UK 1967
Graduate Institute of Electronic & Radio Engineers. (London) 1964
B.Sc.(3 Yrs) S.D.College/Punjab University, India 1961
Professional Experience
04/88 - Present. Private Practice of Law and Engineering with special emphasis on information technology and intellectual property. (Part time practice started in 1974)
02/85 - 03/88. Consultant and Avionics Systems Integration Engineer. Sikorsky Aircraft Stratford, Conn. Designed and developed avionics integration plan for the SHADOW (Sikorsky Advanced Demonstrator of Operator Workload) project in support of the US Army LHX/SCAT (Light Helicopter Experimental for hybrid SCout/ATtack missions) program and authored Symphony macros for the 24 minute proposal system.
10/80 - 01/85. Senior Member Technical Staff. ITT Shelton, Connecticut & Stuttgart, Germany. Solved system wide clock problem in successful transfer of 3 modules of distributed processing PBX technology (using Intel 8086 chips) from R & D in USA to manufacturing in Europe.
1965 - 1980. English Electric of England, University of Notre Dame, AT&T NCR, Dayton Police Department, State of Minnesota, Sperry Univac, & E Systems.
Legal Accomplishments
Invented & prosecuted the first Software patent ever (4,270,182).
Helped over 100 clients resolve civil, criminal, intellectual property and computer law issues and gained extensive court room experience.
Over 25 years patent prosecution and other intellectual property experience (Patent Office Registration Number 27,113)
Developed and conducted seminars for lawyers on "How to Protect Computer Programs" and related computer law issues.
Candidate for the Minnesota House of Representatives in 1976.
Law school editorial and moot court experience.
Mangerial Accomplishments
Managed as the executive director a multi-million dollar Minnesota Crime Information System supporting 3 computers, 15 professionals and a 31 member policy & review board.
Managed as program manager Orange County Transit Districts Mobile Digital Communication system for "DIAL-A-RIDE" vehicles.
Supervised and guided the work of S technicians in the electronics shop of the Atomic Energy Commission radiation lab at the University of Notre Dame.
Developed and conducted training programs and seminars on interaction between technology and the criminal justice for Dayton Police Command.
Managed the Encoder-Reader project by coordinating the work of analog, mechanical and optics experts.
Able Toastmaster Number 772 in 1971.
Technical Accomplishments
Designed developed and implemented a microphone inhibit strategy for Orange County Transit District Mobile digital Communication System for Dial-A-Ride vehicles to eliminate unwanted interruptions.
Developed and implemented a fail-soft/fail-safe strategy to automatically reconfigure out defective equipment in the German and Korean air traffic control systems.
Networked city, county and state criminal justice computers CDC Cyber 72-16, Univac 418-III and IBM 370-158 respectively and developed and implemented the first computerized police reporting system in USA.
Invented, the first postal bar code reader (U S Patent 3,796,862)
Invented, patented, prototyped and used a robot to debate "LIVE" with a human being in real time ( U S Patent 4,107,462)
Invented SWIFT-ANSWER natural language fault tolerant interface, the first software patent ever (4,270,182)
Developed encoding/decoding logic for thermal printers for U S Army & Navy
Developed new methodology for logic design (IEEE Spectrum Dec. 68)
Designed Thyrister Misfire Detector for Pakistan Railways using integrated circuits in its logic design in 1967
This paper presents a new Universal Relationships Law and proposes minor corrections to the science of such icons of science as Aristotle, Galileo, Sir Isaac Newton and even Einstein. Following examples are included:
Lighter Bodies Travel Faster. Aristotle got it backwards when he intuited heavier objects fall faster.
Faster Objects Become Lighter or conversely slower objects become heavier. Einstein and Aristotle both got it backwards when Einstein restated a corollary of Aristotle, "Heavier objects fall faster" by postulating "Faster Objects become heavier".
Two Minor Corrections to Newton's First Law of Motion and a minor correction to the Universal Law of Gravitation named after him.
Three D or No D (Any theory based on other than 3 D is fantastic).
Gravity is A Local and Physical Contact Force.
Light is never Waves and Photons at the Same Instant.
The paper concludes with the self evident inevitability of one and only one reality in here and out there.
This paper postulates a virtual Universe within our known physical Universe occupying same space and time. It compares and con-trasts properties, similarities, differences and relationships between the two universes. A particular attention is paid to the interface between the two and the challenges of building and/or traversing bridges between them. A number of inflection points between the two are identified. The paper also delineates their relationship to big bang, theory of evolution, gravity, dark matter, black holes, time travel, speed of light, theory of relativity and string theory just to name a few. Several new terms are introduced and defined to dis-cuss proper relationship, transition and interface between the body, brain and mind of physical bodies & beings with that of virtual, meta and ultra bodies and beings and how the ?Virtual Inside? relates to people, pets, plants and particles and their micro constituents as well as macro sets. The past, present, potential and elsewhere of the concurrent universes is compared along with many myths and misconceptions of the modern physics. Finally possible pathways to the discovery of TOE (Theory of Everything) are hypothesized.
Towards a Theory of Everything Integrating Known Physical and Invisible Virtual Universe
This paper, which is a continuation of the paper I presented last year at the NPA conference at Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs , postulates a virtual universe within our known physical universe occupying same space and time. It compares and contrasts properties, similarities, differences and relationships between the two universes. A particular attention is paid to the interface between the two and the challenges of building and/or traversing bridges between them. A number of inflection points between the two are identified. The paper also delineates their relationship to big bang, theory of evolution, gravity, dark matter, black holes, time travel, speed of light, theory of relativity and string theory just to name a few. Several new terms are introduced and defined to discuss proper relationship, transition and interface between the body, brain and mind of physical bodies & beings with that of virtual, meta and ultra bodies and beings and how the "Virtual Inside" relates to people, pets, plants and particles and their micro constituents as well as macro sets. The past, present, potential and elsewhere of the concurrent universes is compared along with many myths and misconceptions of the modern physics. Finally possible pathways to the discovery of TOE (Theory of Everything) are hypothesized.
Minor Corrections to Natural Philosophy & Physics of Aristotle, Galileo, Sir Isaac Newton and Einstein
This paper attempts to fix certain errors, myths and misconceptions in classical and contemporary physics, including but not limited to those of Aristotle, Galileo, Newton and Einstein. More specifically it answers some very simple questions like ?Do Heavier Objects Fall Faster?? as hypothesized by Aristotle over two millennia ago, or ?Not?, as experimentally proven by Galileo over five centuries ago. Other simple questions answered include: a) Why is dynamic friction less than static friction? b) Does the Moon cause tides in your swimming pool? c) Is Venus rotating in the wrong, or opposite, direction?
Considerable commentary is included about Kepler's laws of planetary motion and Sir Isaac Newton's laws of motion, with some minor corrections to Newton's first law of motion. The paper also identifies conceptual errors made by Einstein in his theory of relativity, relative mass in motion especially at speeds approaching c, twin paradox as a function of time dilation, and presents author's recommendations for fixing some of the myths and misconceptions, including the fairytale of quantum physics. In this context the concepts of Rest, Dead-end, and equilibrium are differentiated.
This paper introduces the concept of UVLM (Universal Virtual Light Medium), with its many types, properties and characteristics, as well as how it is different from the physical light and SVL a special virtual light. Included is the role of UVLM in circular or diagonal (tangential and radial) and rotational motion of the Earth around the Sun. It explains the role of UVLM in quantum physics, chemistry, even cold fusion. The role of UVLM is delineated in physical universe as a subset of the virtual universe. The author attempts to explain, relate and harmonize the role of: a) Electrons in electro-waves, b) Photons in Electro-Magnetic Waves, c) Magons in Magwaves, and d) Gluons in Gluwaves. The paper differentiates UVLM into a) UVLMIN ? Inside every atom, b) UVLMEX ? Outside every atom, c) IUVLMEX ? Inter-atom outside an atom but within a body such as a planet, d) UVLMN ? Higher intensity UVLM in the nucleus of every atom. UVLMEX, UVLMIN & IUVLMEX, respectively, are involved in tangential, radial and rotational motions.
The paper attempts to resolve many antinomies of the physical and virtual universe, including but not limited to: a) Three Polarizer Paradox; b) Venus Rotation in the wrong or opposite direction; c) The Twin Paradox; d) Wave Particle Duality and Schroedinger's cat; e) Why the Moon doesn't cause tides in your back-yard swimming pool; f) Why heavier objects don't fall faster; g) Soul ? Spirit and Mind ? Brain paradoxes; h) Entropy paradox of electromagnetic propagation; i) Dimensional Paradox ? Why fewer dimension appear more; j) Gravity as remote action at a distance vs. contact force; k) Big Bang & Expanding Universe and Pioneer 10 escape from the solar system in 1986 & Pioneer 11 exploration of Saturn and hence renamed Pioneer Saturn.
The paper enumerates some of the concepts that are false, and yet we publish them in textbooks and teach them as true. Examples of such scientific and religious dogma include: a) Gravity as fabric of Space Time Continuum; b) Big Bang from Singularity; c) Theory of Macro Evolution; d) Parallel Universes, Multiple Dimensions & String Theory; e) Inter and intra-disciplinary conflicts in religion, sciences and paranormal, etc.; f) Quantum Physics.
There is But One Reality Dealing with the Whole Being, Implying a Theory of Everything
This presentation develops the theme of ?There is But One Reality. You may not know it. I may not know it. Nobody may know it except God, but it still does not change the fact that there is But ONE Reality out there and in here.? The paper deals with interface between meta-sciences and religion. It presents four possible interfaces between science and religion as follows: a) Fully Compatible; b) Fully Contradictory; c) Gould's Separate Magisteria (w/o contradiction or competition) as enunciated; d) Science and Religion as Synonyms.
Discussion includes how and why science and religion both went wrong, and what can be done to put both of them on the right track. The author explores the role of blind faith in science and role of reasoning in religion, and how the twain can meet in search of that elusive one reality by taking the LCM (Lowest Common Multiple) and HCF (Highest Common Factor) of what agrees among the sciences, meta-sciences, religions and Para-normal phenomenon and extrapolating the same to its limits. The paper harmonizes truth from sciences, religion and paranormal and Meta sciences, and retains what is in agreement and purges what's not. In order to arrive at the Universal Theory of Reality, both science and religion must use, not only observation, experiment, and reasoning, but also faith in and wisdom from the supernatural. It is hard enough to solve a puzzle with all the pieces; it's that much harder to solve the same puzzle with half the pieces missing.
The paper delineates the role of UVLM in sciences, Meta sciences, religion and paranormal phenomenon of all types. It explains how UVLM integrates all these concepts into a single Universal Theory of Reality where the invariance of laws is so universal that it obviates the distinction between physics of sub-atomic particles and macrophysics of astrophysicists. In addition to the concept of UVLM, this paper introduces the concept of SVL (Special Virtual Light), which has several sub-types as SVLH for humans, SVLA for animals and SVLV for vegetation, and SVLP for Particles and Planets. However these four sub-types are different from each other both in quality and quantity. Specifically the author delineates and compares and contrasts the three lights: viz Physical light, UVLM and SVL in greater detail.
Two other new concepts of powers and energies introduced are SVP ? Special Virtual Power and SVG ? Special Virtual Guide. Also discussed is the relationship of these three types of lights to the following four types of beings and kingdoms: a) Physical Beings (Half) in the Terrestrial Inferior Kingdom (Humans on Earth); b) Meta Beings (Full) in the Terrestrial Superior Kingdom (Includes Angels); c) Virtual Beings (restricted) in Virtual Kingdom (Limited) (e.g. Spirits); d) Ultra Beings in Celestial Kingdom (Gods).
Finally the author introduces the concept of VPF ? Virtual Physicality Factor, which can vary from 0 (completely virtual) to 1 (completely physical) Inter kingdom travel requires changing the VPF. Time permitting, the author will also present role of aliens and UFOs in these four Kingdoms.
This paper and concomitant presentation build upon the theme "There is But ONE Reality". It is continuation and clarification of previous presentations by the author. Some of the topics covered include:
Unique attributes of UVLM (Universal Virtual Light Medium), FTPU (Finite Temporal Physical Universe) and IEVU (Infinite Eternal Virtual Universe)
Gravitation as contact force
Five Way Miracles of Light and Life
Sources of Errors
Corrections to Constants of Nature
Minor corrections to science of such icons of science as Aristotle, Galileo, Sir Isaac Newton and Einstein
3D or NO D, 3M or NO M, 3T or NO T as basis of Counter-intuitive Dimensional Confusion
GPS works not because of science but in spite of science and it certainly does not vindicate Einstein's Theory of Relativity
2nd Law of Thermodynamics and the myth of closed systems
Why is Universal Law of Relationships superior to Newton's Universal Gravitation Law
How much does the Universe weigh?
Tripartite half beings each as male or female, or six partite whole being
Doctrine of Triple Channel Equivalence and interchangeability of Interventional, Environmental and Virtual channels
Resolution of paradoxes, such as Twin paradox, Wave Particle duality and more
The author will delineate why ONE Reality is our best hope for achieving "Theory of Everything" and it based upon the premise that truth agrees with truth regardless of its source or label. The paper delineates the challenges of finding and communicating the illusive but common & absolute reality to various communities of science, religion, and paranormal and general public. The task of finding this illusive reality, reaching a consensus and communicating the consensus to all concerned is of Juggernaut proportions. The chances of success are greatly increased by application of faith in science and reason in religion. One technique employed is the use of LCM (Lowest Common Multiple) and HCF (Highest Common Factor) of what is common between science and religion and every truth in between. Another helpful tool is purging of erroneous knowledge especially if it originated from
In re SRT v/s SRT : From Aristotle to Einstein Even To Date - Same Folly Rules the Paradigm of Special Relativity
This paper and concomitant presentation prepared a couple of months in advance of his WebEx video presentation to NPA on Sept. 5, 2009 traces the errors in special relativity to Aristotle more than two millennia ago and how with an unintended boost from an Icon of Science Einstein himself, the paradigm that rules physics and indeed all science has been corrupted, which main stream science continues to follow blindly and even worship Einstein for it as a gesture of gratitude. How could the great scientist make such an error and why scientists still not have been able to fix it is an ever perplexing and baffling mystery, which I will try to demystify by many precision calculations and analysis.
This is compilation of two articles published in the Infinite Energy circa 2008.
The Future of Science is a combined report of 4 conferences attended by Our Pal Asija
A report about the Nobel Prize and life of Alfred Nobel from Stockholm Sweden as well as Report of the PCST-2008 from Copenhagen Denmark.
PCST (Public Communication of Science and Technology) conference in 2008 was he;d in two countries Sweden and Denmark. This conference is held every two years. The next one is in 2010 in New Delhi India from Dec 6-10.
This paper and concomitant presentation after defining mass, gravity and light explore the gravity reality in detail as well as the relationship of mass gravity and light to the paradigm of reality as there is But ONE Reality in here and out there. A helpful tool in quest of reality is purging of erroneous knowledge especially if it originated from such icons of science as Aristotle, Galileo, Sir Isaac Newton and even Einstein and such icons of religion as Popes and High Priests. More specifically it includes two minor corrections to Newton's first law of motion and two minor corrections to Einstein's SRT. Cause and effect confusion between gravity and motion is obviate as gravity does not make the world go around but world going around makes gravity. Motion of the universe is the cause and gravity is the effect.
Time permitting some of the following topics may be covered.
Universal Relationships Law
How and why zero, one and Infinity equal each other and their reciprocals
3D or No D; 3T or No T and 3M or No M
Triple channel Equivalence and interchangeability of Interventional, Environmental and Virtual channels
Five Way Miracle of Light (Seeing) and Five way Miracle of Life (Extropy or Opposite of Entropy what Schr?dinger called Negentropy)
Corrections to Constants of Nature
How GPS does not vindicate Einstein's Theory of Relativity as it works not because of science but in spite of science
Second Law of Thermodynamics and the myth of closed systems
This paper and concomitant presentation contrary to intuition and experience prove the unity of zero, 1 and infinity. The paper delineates the following concepts:
Similarities and differences between zero and infinity and relative and absolute as well as finite and infinite (or point) number line
The infinitude of point and the point of infinitude
How zero, 1 and infinity equal each other as well as their reciprocals
Limit if any to Zoom-In and Zoom Out
Attributes and properties of Zero and infinity such as Unreachable, Invisible, Indivisible, Incomprehensible
Graphic representation of zero and infinity in relative and physical space
How and why any and every infinitesimal part of infinity is infinite in its own right, unless first partitioned and isolated, even with an invisible but un-crossable veil
Attributes and properties of zero, one and infinity
This paper and concomitant presentation make a case for following propositions:
There is no such thing as traveling non-physical wave(s) and hence there cannot be any electromagnetic (including light) or gravity waves.
We see everything in cosmology in real time regardless of distance and speed of light.
Gravity reality is explored in greater detail as well as the relationship of gravity and light (or any traveling virtual waves) to the paradigm of reality as there is But ONE Reality in here and out there. A helpful tool in quest of reality is purging of erroneous knowledge especially if it originated from such icons of science as Aristotle, Galileo, Sir Isaac Newton and even Einstein and such icons of religion as Popes and High Priests. More specifically it includes two minor corrections to Newton’s first law of motion and two minor corrections to Einstein’s SRT. Cause and effect confusion between gravity and motion is obviate as gravity does not make the world go around but world going around makes gravity. Motion of the universe is the cause and gravity is the effect.
Time permitting some of the following topics may be covered.
Universal Relationships Law
How and why zero, one and Infinity equal each other and their reciprocals
3D or No D; 3T or No T and 3M or No M
Triple channel Equivalence and interchangeability of Interventional, Environmental and Virtual channels
Five Way Miracle of Vision (Eye + Light + object + information + brain) ) and Five way Miracle of Life (Body + soul + spirit + Entropy Extropy (or Opposite of Entropy what Schr?dinger called Negentropy); or (brain + mind + intelligence + Extropy + Entropy)
Corrections to Constants of Nature
How GPS does not vindicate Einstein’s Theory of Relativity as it works not because of science but in spite of science
Second Law of Thermodynamics and the myth of closed systems
Physical and virtual light and their relationship to aether
Significance of 2.7 degrees Kelvin CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation) in view of mostly hollow nature of matter and space
This paper and concomitant presentation deal with the concept of couplets and threesome (triplets), foursomes (Quadruplets), fivers (Quintuplets), sixes (Hexads), seven (Septet) and so on. Couplets and groupls of couplets are defined as two or more entities that always exist together and make sense only as a pair or group. They are born (come into existence) together, grow or diminish proportionally together or die (go out of existence) together.
The paper presents several examples of famous couplets and more. Examples of famous couplets include correlated pair of virtual particles, Male & Female, Mass & Matter, Good and Evil, entropy and extropy and many more. Examples of triplets include mass, motion and time; time temperature and entropy; length, breadth and height; X, Y & Z axis; three orthogonal planes; past present & potential (future); perception, processing and presentation, body soul & spirit; brain, mind & intelligence and so on.
Also included are a couple of examples of quintuplets
Five way miracle of Seeing (eye + light + object + information + brain) and
Five way miracle of life (body + soul + spirit + entropy + extropy) or (brain + mind + Intelligence + Entropy + Extropy) Like the irreducible complexity popularized by Michael Behe, all five are necessary for vision and life respectively.
Couplets are divided into 4 types as follows:
Synonymic Couplets for example zero and nothing, mass & matter, stuff and things, bad and evil, pain & sorrow, Good and God, Evil and devil, gravity & motion etc.
Antonymic couplets for example zero and infinity; physical and virtual, body and soul, brain & mind, pleasure and pain etc.
Neutral Couplets for example mass and time, matter and motion, iso and cross, homo and hetero
Complementary couplets for example husband and wife, man and woman, male and female, Gay & Lesbian, brain & intelligence
Many unique attributes and properties of couplets are delineated inter alia:
Couplets can be rearranged from one type to another for examples homos into heteros and vice-a-versa
Some couplets and groups of couplets have synergy and therefore may be thought of a s synergistic couplets
Couplets have meaning only with respect to each other. Couplets are meaningless without the partner. If one of the two can exist without the other then it is not a couplet but two singlets
Some couplets are broken up by premature death of one but not the other for example parent and child, in which case the other becomes a singlet
Structure of matter (mass, stuff, objects etc) and the structure universe is the dynamic [equilibrium, dead end stop or solitary mass (No other mass in the vicinity as at or near the edge of the universe) in motion] relationship between the trio of 1) mass (matter, objects or its synonyms), 2) motion and 3) time within our range of perception (with or without instrumentation) with infinite variety of geometric shapes, beyond which range the structural infinite variety continues from infinitesimal to infinity, notwithstanding a dynamic structure may appear static if beyond human perception range and/or against a STOP (AKA Dead-End). The weight of the universe is about 10100 grams.
Universal Law of Gravitation in the denominator should be product of the distances to accommodate and facilitate three or more bodies analysis
Einstein's Special Relativity
Time dilation should be time contraction
Mass increase should be mass reduction
Length contraction should be size/volume contraction
Mass Energy Equation should be cut in half
Galileo's Pendulum Formula should include mass term such that
T = 2 Pai [(l+m)/g]1/2
Corrections to interpretation, Interpolation & extrapolation of Genesis
What God did on first two days of creation (Gen.1:1-8) why and how
The great flood geology and source of water
Corrections to Mathematics especially zero and infinity as synonyms
Additions to One Reality
Universal Relationship Law comparable in scope to Newton's Universal Gravitation Law in terms of its potential contribution to our understanding of our universe.
Four Novel Quintuplets
Hearing (Ear + Sound Source + Medium + Information + Brain)
Vision (Eye + Object + Light + Information + Brain)
Smell (Source + Medium + Sensors + Transducers + Brain)
Life (Body & Brain + Soul & Mind + Spirit & Intelligence + Entropy & Extropy + Purpose & Plans)
The "Whole Being"? including Iso & Cross akin to Male & Female
The triple channel
Virtual channel
Interventional channel
Environmental Channel (Hybrid of virtual & interventional)
Some novel couplets and relationship of couplets to famous triplets and Quadruplets and higher order
The Anthroptimum Principle
New Attributes & Properties of the Universe "Everything is a virtual particle" We see everything in Real Time "There are no travelling non-physical waves ( No E-M/light/Gravity waves)" Meaning of CMB "Closed Systems & 2nd Law of Thermodynamics" Black holes as anchors
This paper and concomitant
presentation delineate how this one URL is comparable in scope to Newton’s UGL
(Universal Law of Gravitation) for potential to contribute to our understanding
of our universe, which is breath taking in all humility, by following examples.
1.In
URL range II (From Vn to ‘c’) how
a)Aristotle
and Einstein both WRONG
b)Galileo
and everybody to date also Wrong
c)URL
Correction applies
2.In
URL Range I (From 0 to Vn ) how
a)Aristotle
and Einstein inadvertently unintentional RIGHT
b)Galileo
and everybody WRONG
c)URL
Correction applies
3.Only Galileo (& all those who still
agree with him)
a)WRONG in both ranges.
b)OUR PAL RIGHT in both ranges because of
valid URL correction
4.Hints of Evidence FOR (Our Pal Position) “Lighter go faster or
Heavier go slower in range II”
a)Experience in Accelerators for speeds
approaching ‘c’
b)Smaller particles as in Saturn’s rings go
faster
c)Galileo’s pendulum swing rate ( shorter pendulum
swings faster and likewise lower mass pendulum also swings faster)
5.Hints of Evidence FOR (Aristotle-Einstein
position) “Heavier fall faster lighter go slower in range II”
a)Nature applies mass proportionate force to
Newton’s 2nd law
b)Shuttle to space station docking experience
– lower orbit is a faster orbit regardless of mass differential between lower
mass of shuttle compared to larger mass of the international space station.
Note: The statements flip when any
of the following are reversed:
a)FOR & AGAINST
b)Our Pal & Aristotle Einstein
c)Slower and Faster
d)Lighter and Heavier
e)Range I and Range II
P.S. to Note: In case of multiple
flips, the rule is to flop only for odd number of flips (1, 3, 5) and no change
is warranted to flip even number of times (2 or 4)
6.Mass Motion and Gravity Interface
a)Aristotle’s Intuition
b)Galileo’s Experiments and Empirical
Evidence
c)Einstein’s SRT (Special Relativity Theory
with inherent inconsistency between length contraction and Mass increase)
d)Our Pal correction (Ratio of Ratios)
NOTE: Our inability
to measure small effect is neither evidence FOR nor AGAINST any of the three
following positions.
a)Aristotle-Einstein That heavier fall faster
or faster get more massive
b)Galileo and everybody who agrees with
Galileo even today that lighter and heavier fall at the same rate in vacuum.
c)Our Pal position that lighter go faster
The Power of URL to Delineate Mass, Motion & More
(year unknown)
Pal Asija 7 Woonsocket Avenue, Pal Mahal, Shelton, CT 06484-5536, United States; Pal@OurPal.com, (203) 924-9538, www.OurPal.com Keywords: Universal, Relationship, Law, Cosmology, Astronomy
Abstract:
This paper and concomitant
presentation delineate how this one URL is comparable in scope to Newton’s UGL
(Universal Law of Gravitation) for potential to contribute to our understanding
of our universe, which is breath taking in all humility, by following examples.
1.In
URL range II (From Vn to ‘c’) how
a)Aristotle
and Einstein both WRONG
b)Galileo
and everybody to date also Wrong
c)URL
Correction applies
2.In
URL Range I (From 0 to Vn ) how
a)Aristotle
and Einstein inadvertently unintentional RIGHT
b)Galileo
and everybody WRONG
c)URL
Correction applies
3.Only Galileo (& all those who still
agree with him)
a)WRONG in both ranges.
b)OUR PAL RIGHT in both ranges because of
valid URL correction
4.Hints of Evidence FOR (Our Pal Position) “Lighter go faster or
Heavier go slower in range II”
a)Experience in Accelerators for speeds
approaching ‘c’
b)Smaller particles as in Saturn’s rings go
faster
c)Galileo’s pendulum swing rate ( shorter pendulum
swings faster and likewise lower mass pendulum also swings faster)
5.Hints of Evidence FOR (Aristotle-Einstein
position) “Heavier fall faster lighter go slower in range II”
a)Nature applies mass proportionate force to
Newton’s 2nd law
b)Shuttle to space station docking experience
– lower orbit is a faster orbit regardless of mass differential between lower
mass of shuttle compared to larger mass of the international space station.
Note: The statements flip when any
of the following are reversed:
a)FOR & AGAINST
b)Our Pal & Aristotle Einstein
c)Slower and Faster
d)Lighter and Heavier
e)Range I and Range II
P.S. to Note: In case of multiple
flips, the rule is to flop only for odd number of flips (1, 3, 5) and no change
is warranted to flip even number of times (2 or 4)
6.Mass Motion and Gravity Interface
a)Aristotle’s Intuition
b)Galileo’s Experiments and Empirical
Evidence
c)Einstein’s SRT (Special Relativity Theory
with inherent inconsistency between length contraction and Mass increase)
d)Our Pal correction (Ratio of Ratios)
NOTE: Our inability
to measure small effect is neither evidence FOR nor AGAINST any of the three
following positions.
a)Aristotle-Einstein That heavier fall faster
or faster get more massive
b)Galileo and everybody who agrees with
Galileo even today that lighter and heavier fall at the same rate in vacuum.
c)Our Pal position that lighter go faster
The Power of URL to Delineate Mass, Motion & More
(2010)
Pal Asija 7 Woonsocket Avenue, Pal Mahal, Shelton, CT 06484-5536, United States; Pal@OurPal.com, (203) 924-9538, www.OurPal.com Keywords: Universal, Relationship, Theory, Everything, unified, gravity
Abstract:
This paper and concomitant
presentation delineate how this one URL is comparable in scope to Newton’s UGL
(Universal Law of Gravitation) for potential to contribute to our understanding
of our universe, which is breath taking in all humility, by following examples.
1.In
URL range II (From Vn to ‘c’) how
a)Aristotle
and Einstein both WRONG
b)Galileo
and everybody to date also Wrong
c)URL
Correction applies
2.In
URL Range I (From 0 to Vn ) how
a)Aristotle
and Einstein inadvertently unintentional RIGHT
b)Galileo
and everybody WRONG
c)URL
Correction applies
3.Only Galileo (& all those who still
agree with him)
a)WRONG in both ranges.
b)OUR PAL RIGHT in both ranges because of
valid URL correction
4.Hints of Evidence FOR (Our Pal Position) “Lighter go faster or
Heavier go slower in range II”
a)Experience in Accelerators for speeds
approaching ‘c’
b)Smaller particles as in Saturn’s rings go
faster
c)Galileo’s pendulum swing rate ( shorter pendulum
swings faster and likewise lower mass pendulum also swings faster)
5.Hints of Evidence FOR (Aristotle-Einstein
position) “Heavier fall faster lighter go slower in range II”
a)Nature applies mass proportionate force to
Newton’s 2nd law
b)Shuttle to space station docking experience
– lower orbit is a faster orbit regardless of mass differential between lower
mass of shuttle compared to larger mass of the international space station.
Note: The statements flip when any
of the following are reversed:
a)FOR & AGAINST
b)Our Pal & Aristotle Einstein
c)Slower and Faster
d)Lighter and Heavier
e)Range I and Range II
P.S. to Note: In case of multiple
flips, the rule is to flop only for odd number of flips (1, 3, 5) and no change
is warranted to flip even number of times (2 or 4)
6.Mass Motion and Gravity Interface
a)Aristotle’s Intuition
b)Galileo’s Experiments and Empirical
Evidence
c)Einstein’s SRT (Special Relativity Theory
with inherent inconsistency between length contraction and Mass increase)
d)Our Pal correction (Ratio of Ratios)
NOTE: Our inability
to measure small effect is neither evidence FOR nor AGAINST any of the three
following positions.
a)Aristotle-Einstein That heavier fall faster
or faster get more massive
b)Galileo and everybody who agrees with
Galileo even today that lighter and heavier fall at the same rate in vacuum.
